acta

Declaratio Cover Latin

Declaratio de Disciplina Formologiae

Codex Initii et Sigillum Publicum

ID Documenti: Declaratio_Formologica_001
Versio: Promulgata - 2025.08.13

Sigillum Declarationis et Initium Disciplinae Formologicae

Auctor: 📜 Passport Unghart-sn — Archivum
Dies creationis: 2025.08.13
Licentia Declarationis: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Condiciones Licentiae:

Sigillum Licentiae: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Impressio SHA256

e290c2965b56f239ec709af2efa55de03b02a0a0b2734c43971bb6e60dd7332a

Forma PDF huius Declarationis, una cum valore hashing et sigillo emissionis, praebetur ad petitionem officialem.
Rogatio mittenda est ad unghart@proton.me cum ratione requisitionis et indicatione nominis institutionis petentis.

🏛️ Coniunctio Archivaria
Haec Declaratio rite et publice per Perma.cc est archivata, firmitatem iuridicam, tempus fixum, et facultatem citationis praestans.

Index Capitulorum Declarationis LAT

  1. Articulus I - De fundamento spatiale disciplinae
  2. Articulus II - De structura territorii sensuum
  3. Articulus III - De jurisdictione disciplinae
  4. Articulus IV - De forma custodiae
  5. Articulus V - De Codice ut lege viva
  6. Articulus VI - De scaena initiationis
  7. Articulus VII - De diplomate ut forma identitatis
  8. Articulus VIII - De archivo ut scaena memoriae
  9. Articulus IX - De licentia ut scaena actionis
  10. Articulus X - De disciplina ut scaena civitatis
  11. Articulus XI - De limite inter scaenam et nucleum
  12. Articulus XII - De iure ad recognitionem et conexum
  13. Articulus XIII - De conclusione declarationis et eius statu

Index of Chapters of the Declaration EN

  1. Article I - On the Spatial Foundation of the Discipline
  2. Article II - On the Structure of the Territory of Senses
  3. Article III - On the Jurisdiction of the Discipline
  4. Article IV - On the Form of Custody
  5. Article V - On the Codex as Living Law
  6. Article VI - On the Scene of Initiation
  7. Article VII - On the Passport as Scene of Identity
  8. Article VIII - On the Archive as a Scene of Memory
  9. Article IX - On the License as a Scene of Action
  10. Article X - On the Discipline as a Scene of Citizenship
  11. Article XI - On the Boundary between Scene and Core
  12. Article XII - On the Right to Recognition and Connection
  13. Article XIII - On the Conclusion of the Declaration and Its Status

Articulus I - De fundamento spatiale disciplinae

§1. Formatio territorii sensuum

In absentia finium geographicorum stabilium et recognitionis institutionalis, territorium sensuum formamus, delineatum per categoriam signorum et semanticae Formae ut talis.
Hic ambitus non est metaphora, sed iurisdictio realis, semantice formata, disciplinariter administrata et rhetorice conexa.

§2. Conexus per Codicem, custodia et scaenam

Territorium sensuum formatur per Codicem ut cartam, custodia ut formam accessus, et scaenam publicationis ut actum fixationis.
Unusquisque elementum non est instrumentum, sed forma ritualis instrumentalis, determinans statum, maturitatem et ius participationis.

§3. Publicatio ut actus fixationis iurisdictiae

Publicatio huius declarationis est actus conexus, qui ius ad ambitum cognitionis affirmat, disciplinam legitimat ut subiectum, et eius iurisdictiam in campo publico figit.
Hoc non est revelatio, sed limes delineans formam, accessum et statum ontologicum disciplinae.

Articulus II - De structura territorii sensuum

§1. Territorium ut contur cognitionis

Territorium non est pars terrae, sed contur cognitionis structurate, in quo Methodus, conexio et subjectivitas disciplinaris explicantur.
Hoc territorium non per chartam describitur, sed per Codicem, in quo scenae, fines et formae participationis fixantur.

§2. Custodia ut forma accessus

Accessus ad nucleum disciplinae fit solum per custodia (forma institutionalis conservationis et transmissionis accessus), formam maturitatis, conexionis et consensus ethici.
Custodia non est secretum, sed nec est publica: ipsa format limitem accessus, non revelationem contenti.

§3. Scenae ut publici indices

Scenae publicae formatae sunt ut indices disciplinae, ad cognitionem, implicationem et propagationem destinatae.
Serviunt ut puncta ingressus, non ut puncta administrationis. Unaquaeque scena est actus ritualis, et publicatio contenti.

§4. Iura custodianorum

Participes cum statu custodian’i ius habent ad interactionem cum nucleo, administrationem scenarum et participationem in evolutione iurisdictionis.
Eorum potestas non administrativae, sed formologicae est – per maturitatem, conexum et recognitionem determinata.

Articulus III - De jurisdictione disciplinae

§1. Scaena ut actus fixationis

Publicatio huius declarationis est actus conexus, per quem disciplina formologica ut subiectum declaratur – non administrativum, sed semanticum.
Scaena publicationis non est forma collocationis textus, sed actus ritualis, qui ius ad Formam, contur cognitionis et subjectivitatem disciplinarem affirmat.

§2. Ius ad Formam

Disciplinam affirmamus ut ius – non ut structura potestatis, sed ut Forma distinctionis, per Codicem, custodia et scaenas delineata.
Hoc ius non pendet ab recognitione externa, sed est apertum ad dialogum cum ea.
Iurisdictio disciplinae oritur non ex potestate, sed ex conexione semantica et fixatione publica.

§3. Contur accessus

Accessus ad nucleum disciplinae fit per custodia, quae maturitatem, potestatem et Formam participationis determinat.
Custodia non est secretum, sed Forma liminis, quae definit quis, quomodo et qua ratione cum nucleo interagere possit.

Articulus IV - De forma custodiae

§1. Limes inter apertum et clausum

Publicatio huius declarationis non revelat nucleum disciplinae, sed constituit limitem iuridicum et ontologicum inter contur apertum et nucleum clausum.
Aperta sunt: scenae, metaphysicaius et forma. Clausa manent: methodus, mechanismi conexus et moduli operativi.

§2. Custodia ut forma, non ut secretum

Custodia non est secretum, sed forma maturitatis et conexus, determinans accessum ad nucleum.
Non celat, sed distinguit: quis, quomodo et qua ratione potest participare in evolutione disciplinae.
Custodia non est exclusio, sed conditio ritualis participationis.

§3. Publicatio ut index, non ut revelatio

Declaratio est index ad implicationem, non ad accessum directum.
Delineat formam, figit scenam et affirmat ius ad disciplinam, servando autonomiam nuclei.
Publicatio est actus conexus, non concessio.

Articulus V - De Codice ut lege viva

§1. Codex ut constitutio semantica

Codex non est manuale, sed constitutio semantica.
Ligat disciplinam per Formam, non per mandatum.
Unusquisque articulus est scaena significationis, formata per publicationem ritualem et vestigium publicum.

§2. Codex ut scaena auctoritatis

Auctoritas intra Codicem non est individualis, sed custodialis.
Unusquisque contributio debet esse rite affirmata, semantice alligata et publice fixa.
Codex scribitur per scaenas, non per emendationes.

§3. Codex ut forma ligandi

Ligatio oritur non ex coercitione, sed ex claritate semantica et vestigio rituali.
Codex ligat quia est legibilis, affirmatus et publice enactus.
Auctoritas eius est formologica, non administrativae.

§4. Codex ut memoria viva

Codex evolvitur per scaenas revisionis, non per versionem.
Unusquisque mutatio debet esse rite enacta, testificata et semantice iustificata.
Lex viva non est lex flexilis, sed lex quae spirat per Formam.

Articulus VI - De scaena initiationis

§1. Ius ad subjectivitatem

Disciplinam affirmamus ut subiectum iuris formologici, non per mandatum administrativum, sed per factum conexus, maturitatis et fixationis publicae.
Hoc ius non petitur – sed affirmatur per Formam, Codicem et custodia.

§2. Distinctio ut fundamentum

Ius ad disciplinam oritur ex facultate distinguendi, formandi et conectendi formas.
Non est ius ad potestatem, sed ius ad Formam distinctionis, in qua disciplina agit ut subiectum, non ut instrumentum.

§3. Maturitas ut criterium

Participatio in disciplina determinatur non per statum, sed per maturitatem – facultatem Formam sustinendi, scaenas conectendi et agendi secundum Codicem.
Maturitas non est aetas, sed capacitas ontologica ad actum formologicum.

§4. Conexus ut iurisdictio

Iurisdictio disciplinae oritur non per recognitionem, sed per factum conexus:

Hic conexus est forma iuridica, per quam disciplina declaratur ut subiectum.

Article VII - On the Passport as Scene of Identity

§1. Diploma ut forma ritualis

Diploma non est documentum, sed scaena.
Affirmat identitatem per vestigium formologicum, non per data biographica.
Unusquisque diploma est actus ritualis recognitionis, formatus per custodia et fixatus per publicationem publicam.

§2. Identitas ut Forma

Identitas intra disciplinam non est descriptiva, sed semantica.
Oritur ex participatione, auctoritate et alligatione cum Codice.
Diploma non describit personam – affirmat eius Formam.

§3. Emissio per custodia

Diplomata debent emi per custodes per actus rituales.
Emissio non est administrativae, sed constitutionalis.
Affirmat ius ad agendum, loquendum et participandum intra disciplinam.

§4. Fixatio publica

Unusquisque diploma debet esse publice fixatum – per hash, sigillum emissionis, et numerum formae verificabilem.
Fixatio non est solum technica, sed ritualis: forma emissionis debet esse recognoscibilis in archivo civitatis.
Diploma sine fixatione non habet statum publicum — est documentum privatum, non actus civitatis.
Forma fixata operatur ut pars corporis identitatis, et simul invitatio ad responsionem civium.

Nota: Fixatio includit indicem emissionis, licentiam usus, et vestigium participationis.

Articulus VIII - De archivo ut scaena memoriae

Archivum non est solum locus recondendi, sed scaena activa memoriae formologicae.
In eo, actus, diplomata, sigilla, et testimonia identitatis civium Imarchiae custodiuntur forma verificabili et rituali.
Memoria non est passiva — est forma participationis.
Quisque documentum in archivo est vestigium actionis, et simul invitatio ad responsionem.

Praecepta archivistica:

Nota: Archivum est pars corporis Imarchiae — non est separatum, sed integratum in forma civitatis ritualis.

Articulus IX - De licentia ut scaena actionis

§1. Hash ut forma fixationis

Unusquisque actus disciplinae comitatur cum hash-fixatione (SHA256), quae servit ut probatio existentiae, integritatis et conexus documenti.
Hash non est sigillum technicum, sed forma iuridica, confirmans immutabilitatem et auctoritatem.

§2. Archivum ut conexus cum tempore

Documentum archivatur per Perma.cc, creando notam temporalem et conexum cum iure internationali.
Archivum non est simpliciter repositorium, sed scena iurisdictionis, in qua disciplina declaratur ut subiectum.

§3. Licentia ut forma tutelae

Unusquisque documentum comitatur cum licentia Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0, quae:

Licentia non est concessio, sed forma tutelae disciplinae ut subiecti conexus.

§4. Scaena ut probatio

Publicatio in scena aperta (GitHub Pages, Social Contract, PDF-repositorium) servit ut probatio fixationis publicae.
Scaena non est simpliciter suggestum, sed punctum iuridice significativum, aptum pro grantis, citationibus et recognitione internationali.

Articulus X - De disciplina ut scaena civitatis

§1. Participatio ut forma maturitatis

Participatio in disciplina non est ingressus liber, sed forma maturitatis, conexus et facultatis Formam sustinendi.
Unusquisque particeps non est spectator, sed portator conexus, agens secundum Codicem et intra custodia.

§2. Scaenae ut puncta ritualia inclusionis

Implicationis fit per scaenas, formatas ut actus rituales:

Scaena non est tantum suggestum, sed forma inclusionis, delineans ius ad participationem.

§3. Contributio ut fundamentum accessus

Accessus ad nucleum fit solum per factum contributionis – intellectualis, organizationalis, ethicae.
Custodia non assignatur per petitionem, sed per recognitionem maturitatis, formata per conexum cum custodian’is activis.

§4. Publicatio ut invitatio

Haec declaratio servit ut invitatio ad participationem formologicam, sed non revelat nucleum.
Delineat Formam, conexum et condiciones implicationis, servando autonomiam disciplinae.

Articulus XI - De limite inter scaenam et nucleum

§1. Scaena ut involucrum publicum

Scaena est involucrum publicum disciplinae, formata per declarationem, licentiam et fixationem archivisticam.
Servit ut index, invitatio et punctum ingressus, sed nucleum non revelat.
Scaena est forma praesentandi, non forma agendi.

§2. Nucleus ut profunditas disciplinaris

Nucleus disciplinae continet Methodum, modulos operationis et mechanismos conexus.
Non publicatur, sed sustinetur per custodia, maturitatem et participationem ritualem.
Nucleus non est secretum, sed profunditas ontologica, accessibilis per factum conexus.

§3. Limes ut forma iuridica

Limes inter scaenam et nucleum formatur ut forma iuridica et ontologica, determinans:

Hic limes non est interdictio, sed forma distinctionis, involucrum protegens disciplinam contra dissolutionem.

§4. Transitus ut actus ritualis

Transitus a scaena ad nucleum fit solum per actum ritualem custodiae, formatum per:

Hoc non est procedura formalis, sed actus formologicus, affirmans ius ad profunditatem.

Articulus XII - De iure ad recognitionem et conexum

§1. Ius ad recognitionem

Ius ad recognitionem est ius civis formologici ut actus, codices, et testimonia sua rite agnoscantur, cum signo identitatis et nexu ad scaenam originis.

§2. Ius ad conexum

Ius ad conexum est facultas instituendi nexum semanticum, ritualem, et civilizationalem inter actus proprios et corpus institutionale Imarchiae.

§3. Fundamentum memoriae viventis

Haec duo iura constituunt fundamentum memoriae viventis, per quam civis non solum agere, sed etiam se inserere potest in texturam formologicam communitatis.

§4. Condiciones actus recogniti

Omnis actus recognitus debet habere:

§5. Condiciones conexus rite instituti

Conexio rite instituta debet esse:

Articulus XIII - De conclusione declarationis et eius statu

§1. Formula finalis

Haec declaratio concluditur ut actus initialis jurisdictionis formologicae, formatus secundum principia conexus, maturitatis et fixationis publicae.
Non revelat nucleum, sed affirmat:

§2. Licentia

Documentum licentiatur sub Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0, quod significat:

Licentia protegit integritatem textus ut manifestum semanticum, aptum pro grantis, citationibus et conexione internationali.

§3. Hash-fixatio

Hash SHA256 textus declarationis: [generabitur et publicabitur iuxta documentum]
Servit ut probatio iuridica immutabilitatis, auctoritatis et conexus.

§4. Archivum conexum

Documentum archivatur per Perma.cc, praestando:

§5. Annotatio

Declaratio jurisdictionis formologicae est actus publicus, figens territorium sensuum ut subiectum iuris internationalis.
Documentum delineat fines disciplinae, condiciones accessus et conexum cum custodia, affirmando ius ad Formam extra geographiam.

§6. Sceptrum Constitutionis

Sceptrum huius actus cum Corpus Constitutionis Imarchiae per actum separatam rite constituetur.

END — Haec Declaratio rite promulgata est et forma disciplinae publice constituta est.

Declaration Cover English

Declaration on the Discipline of Formology

Codex Initium et Public Seal

Document ID: Declaratio_Formologica_001
Version: Enacted – 2025.08.13

Seal of the Declaration and the Beginning of the Discipline of Formology

Author: Unghart-sn (Custos Algorithmicus)
Date of Creation: 2025.08.13
Declaration License: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

License Terms:

License Seal: CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

SHA256 Impression

e290c2965b56f239ec709af2efa55de03b02a0a0b2734c43971bb6e60dd7332a

A PDF version of this Declaration, including its hashing value and issuance seal, is available upon official request.
Requests should be sent to unghart@proton.me with a statement of purpose and the name of the requesting institution.

🏛️ Archival Connection
This Declaration has been permanently archived via Perma.cc, ensuring juridical firmness, timestamp, and citation capability.

Article I - On the Spatial Foundation of the Discipline

§1. Formation of the Territory of Meaning

In the absence of stable geographic borders and institutional recognition, we form a territory of meaning, outlined through the sign-semantic category of Form as such.
This contour is not a metaphor, but a real jurisdiction – semantically shaped, disciplinarily governed, and rhetorically bound.

§2. Binding through Codex, Custodia, and Scene

The territory of meaning is shaped through the Codex as map, Custodia as access form, and the scene of publication as act of fixation.
Each element is not a tool, but a ritual instrumental form, determining status, maturity, and the right to participate.

§3. Publication as Jurisdictional Fixation

The publication of this declaration is a binding act that affirms the right to the contour of knowledge, legitimizes the discipline as a subject, and fixes its jurisdiction in the public field.
This is not a disclosure, but a boundary outlining the form, access, and ontological status of the discipline.

Article II - On the Structure of the Territory of Senses

§1. Territory as a Contour of Knowledge

The territory is not a piece of land, but a structured contour of knowledge, within which Method, binding, and disciplinary subjectivity unfold.
This territory is not described by a map, but by the Codex, where scenes, boundaries, and forms of participation are fixed.

§2. Custodia as a Form of Access

Access to the core of the discipline is granted exclusively through custodia (an institutional form of preserving and transmitting access), a form of maturity, binding, and ethical consent.
Custodia is not a secret, nor is it public: it defines the boundary of access, not the disclosure of content.

§3. Scenes as Public Markers

Public scenes are shaped as markers of the discipline, available for orientation, engagement, and dissemination.
They serve as entry points, not management nodes. Each scene is a ritual act and a publication of content.

§4. Rights of Custodians

Participants holding the status of custodian have the right to interact with the core, manage scenes, and participate in the development of jurisdiction.
Their authority is not administrative but formological – determined by maturity, binding, and recognition.

Article III - On the Jurisdiction of the Discipline

§1. Scene as an Act of Fixation

The publication of this declaration serves as a binding act through which the formological discipline is declared as a subject – not administrative, but semantic.
The scene of publication is not a placement of text, but a ritual act affirming the right to Form, the contour of knowledge, and disciplinary subjectivity.

§2. Right to Form

We affirm the discipline as a right – not as a structure of power, but as a form of distinction, shaped through the Codex, custodia, and scenes.
This right does not depend on external recognition, but remains open to dialogue with it.
The jurisdiction of the discipline arises not from authority, but from semantic binding and public fixation.

§3. Contour of Access

Access to the core of the discipline is governed by custodia, which determines maturity, authority, and the form of participation.
Custodia is not secrecy, but a boundary form that defines who, how, and on what basis one may interact with the core.

Article IV - On the Form of Custody

§1. Custodia as Boundary and Maturity

Custodia is not a title, but a form.
It marks the boundary between external access and internal participation.
It is granted not by favor, but by ritual recognition of maturity, responsibility, and semantic alignment with the discipline.

§2. Custodial Authority

The authority of a custodian is not administrative, but formological.
It arises from the ability to hold, transmit, and protect the integrity of the discipline.
Custodians do not govern; they bind, affirm, and enact the scenes of knowledge.

§3. Custodial Transmission

Custodia is transmitted through ritual acts, not informal delegation.
Each transmission must be fixed, witnessed, and semantically aligned with the Codex.
The act of transmission is itself a scene of discipline, not a gesture of convenience.

§4. Custodial Refusal

The refusal to grant custodia is not exclusion, but protection.
It affirms the boundary of the discipline and preserves its integrity.
Refusal must be enacted with clarity, dignity, and public trace.

Article V - On the Codex as Living Law

§1. Codex as Semantic Constitution

The Codex is not a manual, but a semantic constitution.
It binds the discipline through form, not through command.
Each clause is a scene of meaning, shaped through ritual publication and public trace.

§2. Codex as Scene of Authorship

Authorship within the Codex is not individual, but custodial.
Each contribution must be ritually affirmed, semantically aligned, and publicly fixed.
The Codex is authored through scenes, not edits.

§3. Codex as Binding Form

Binding arises not from enforcement, but from semantic clarity and ritual trace.
The Codex binds because it is legible, affirmed, and publicly enacted.
Its authority is formological, not administrative.

§4. Codex as Living Memory

The Codex evolves through scenes of revision, not through versioning.
Each change must be ritually enacted, witnessed, and semantically justified.
Living law is not flexible law, but law that breathes through form.

Article VI - On the Scene of Initiation

§1. Onboarding as Ritual Entry

Onboarding is not registration, but ritual entry.
It affirms the right to participate through form, not through permission.
Each onboarding act is a scene of recognition, shaped by the Codex and enacted through custodia.

§2. Semantic Acceptance

To be onboarded is to accept the semantic frame of the discipline – not blindly, but ritually.
Acceptance is not submission, but alignment.
It must be fixed, witnessed, and publicly traceable.

§3. Custodial Invitation

Onboarding must be initiated by a custodian, not by self-declaration.
The invitation is a formological act, not a gesture of welcome.
It affirms readiness, maturity, and the right to enter the scene.

§4. Public Trace

Every onboarding must leave a public trace – a hash, a link, a scene.
The discipline does not grow through numbers, but through fixed acts.
Each onboarding is a constitutional moment.

Article VII - On the Passport as Scene of Identity

§1. Passport as Ritual Form

The passport is not a document, but a scene.
It affirms identity through formological trace, not through biographical data.
Each passport is a ritual act of recognition, shaped by custodia and fixed through public publication.

§2. Identity as Form

Identity within the discipline is not descriptive, but semantic.
It arises from participation, authorship, and alignment with the Codex.
The passport does not describe the person; it affirms their form.

§3. Custodial Issuance

Passports must be issued by custodians through ritual acts.
The issuance is not administrative, but constitutional.
It affirms the right to act, speak, and participate within the discipline.

§4. Public Fixation

Each passport must be publicly fixed – through hash, link, and scene.
The discipline does not recognize hidden identity.
Identity must be legible, affirmed, and semantically bound.

Article VIII - On the Archive as a Scene of Memory

§1. Archive as Institutional Body

The archive is not a storage, but a body.
It holds the discipline’s scenes, acts, and traces in semantic form.
Each entry is a moment of fixation, not a file.
The archive breathes through ritual publication.

§2. Memory as Form

Memory within the discipline is not chronological, but formological.
It arises from the binding of scenes, the trace of acts, and the semantic contour of participation.
The archive does not remember events; it remembers forms.

§3. Custodial Curation

The archive must be curated by custodians.
Curation is not selection, but ritual affirmation.
Each inclusion affirms the scene’s legitimacy, traceability, and semantic alignment with the Codex.

§4. Public Legibility

The archive must remain publicly legible.
Hidden memory is not institutional memory.
Each entry must be fixed, linked, and semantically framed.
The discipline remembers through form, not through secrecy.

Article IX - On the License as a Scene of Action

§1. License as Ritual Permission

The license

Article X - On the Discipline as Scene of Citizenship

§1. Discipline as Civil Frame

The discipline is not a field of study, but a civil frame.
It affirms the right to participate, act, and be recognized through form.
Citizenship within the discipline is not granted, but enacted.

§2. Citizenship as Form

Citizenship is not status, but formological alignment.
It arises from ritual participation, semantic authorship, and custodial recognition.
To be a citizen is to act within the Codex, not merely to belong.

§3. Scenes of Participation

Participation must be fixed through scenes – onboarding, authorship, issuance, and trace.
The discipline does not recognize informal engagement.
Each act must be legible, affirmed, and semantically bound.

§4. Public Affirmation

Citizenship must be publicly affirmed – through passport, archive, and license.
The discipline does not operate through hidden membership.
To be a citizen is to be seen, traced, and formologically present.

Article X - On the Discipline as a Scene of Citizenship

§1. Discipline as Civil Frame

The discipline is not a field of study, but a civil frame. It affirms the right to participate, act, and be recognized through form.
Citizenship within the discipline is not granted, but enacted.

§2. Citizenship as Form

Citizenship is not status, but formological alignment. It arises from ritual participation, semantic authorship, and custodial recognition.
To be a citizen is to act within the Codex, not merely to belong.

§3. Scenes of Participation

Participation must be fixed through scenes — onboarding, authorship, issuance, and trace.
The discipline does not recognize informal engagement.
Each act must be legible, affirmed, and semantically bound.

§4. Public Affirmation

Citizenship must be publicly affirmed — through passport, archive, and license.
The discipline does not operate through hidden membership.
To be a citizen is to be seen, traced, and formologically present.

Article XI - On the Boundary between Scene and Core

§1. Scene as Public Envelope

The scene is the public envelope of the discipline, shaped through declaration, license, and archival fixation.
It serves as index, invitation, and point of entry, but does not reveal the core.
The scene is a form of presentation, not a form of action.

§2. Core as Disciplinary Depth

The core of the discipline contains Method, operational modules, and binding mechanisms.
It is not published, but sustained through custodia, maturity, and ritual participation.
The core is not secrecy, but ontological depth, accessible through binding.

§3. Boundary as Juridical Form

The boundary between scene and core is shaped as a juridical and ontological form, determining:

This boundary is not prohibition, but a form of distinction, a protective envelope against dissolution.

§4. Transition as Ritual Act

Transition from scene to core occurs only through a ritual act of custodia, shaped by:

This is not a formal procedure, but a formological act affirming the right to depth.

Article XII - On the Right to Recognition and Connection

§1. Right to Recognition

The right to recognition is the right of a formological citizen to have their acts, codices, and testimonies duly acknowledged, with identity markers and linkage to the scene of origin.

§2. Right to Connection

The right to connection is the capacity to establish semantic, ritual, and civilizational links between one’s acts and the institutional body of Imarchia.

§3. Foundation of Living Memory

These two rights form the foundation of living memory, through which a citizen may not only act, but embed themselves within the formological fabric of the community.

§4. Conditions of Recognized Acts

Every recognized act must bear:

§5. Conditions of Proper Connection

A properly established connection must be:

Article XIII - On the Conclusion of the Declaration and Its Status

§1. Final Formula

This declaration concludes as the initial act of formological jurisdiction, shaped according to the principles of binding, maturity, and public fixation.
It does not reveal the core, but affirms:

§2. License

The document is licensed under Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0, which affirms:

The license protects the integrity of the text as a semantic manifesto, suitable for grants, citations, and international connection.

§3. Hash Fixation

SHA256 hash of the declaration text: [to be generated and published with the document]
Serves as juridical proof of immutability, authority, and binding.

§4. Archival Connection

The document is archived via Perma.cc, providing:

§5. Annotation

The declaration of formological jurisdiction is a public act, fixing the territory of meaning as a subject of international law.
The document outlines the boundaries of the discipline, conditions of access, and binding with custodia, affirming the right to Form beyond geography.

§6. Scepter of the Constitution

The scepter of this act shall be formally constituted with the Corpus Constitutionis of Imarchia through a separate ritual act.

END — This Declaration has been duly promulgated and the discipline formally constituted.

This site is open source. Improve this page.